The Future of the Anglican Church

From a relatively healthy position, making up twenty percent of the Christian population in 1911, the Anglican Church has now become the smallest mainline denomination in South Africa, comprising only five percent. The only mainline church not to have suffered a similar fate is the Catholic Church, which has tripled its representation in terms of percentage of Christians in South Africa (Symington 2005: 78) (see Figure 1).

Mainline Denominations

Figure 1: Church representation in South Africa in the last century

While there are many reasons why this may be the case, it is not because Christianity is declining. Rather, Africa as a whole, South Africa included, has seen a rise in the number of Christians over the same period in terms of percentage of population as well as in absolute figures. The growth in the church in South Africa has come mainly from the African Independent, Pentecostal, Charismatic and other churches (Hendriks 2010: 1). Why is this?

Emeritus Professor Jurgens Hendriks of Stellenbosch University suggests the decline is as a result of two opposite dangers. The first is that mainline churches hold to certain patterns, whether in worship or in doctrine, that are wholly unnecessary to the life of the church or to Christians, going as far as suggesting that this is a heresy. The second danger is the tendency of churches in the current post-modern culture to suggest that any version, of doctrine or worship, is valid, and leave every church to its own expression of Christianity (Hendriks 2010: 22).

I think we are far from hearing the death rattles of the Anglican Church, my spiritual home, especially in light of the number of churches being planted countrywide, and the Archbishop’s charge to his own Diocese this last Thursday evening.  My aim in this series of blogs is to analyse the situation facing the church and to highlight some of the solutions proposed by key players in the Diocese of Cape Town, as well as the worldwide Anglican Communion.

Please join me on this journey, whether you are Anglican or from another mainline denomination that has struggled similarly this past century. We are in this together, and an improvement in the state of any denomination is a cause for celebration in all others.


Hendriks, J.H. 2010. Highlights from the Alpha Cape Town 2010 Invitation Conference. Retrieved April 30, 2010, from Alpha Western Cape: The Alpha Course:

Hendriks, J.H. 2010. Theological Education In Africa: Reliable leadership, sustainable seminaries. The NetACT story 2000-2010. Retrieved September 05, 2012, from Teologie Stellenbosch:

Symington, J. 2005. South African Christian Handbook 2005-2006. Wellington: Tydskriftemaatskappy.



Formation and Education

This year I started a significantly new journey. Not in that I haven’t traveled it before, but rather in that the change has been significant. From spending five years working in Higher Education, I’ve gone back to being a full-time student and focusing on a vocational guidance process at the St John’s Leadership Academy (SJLA). We’ve also opened our home as an Airbnb home, but that’s a story for another time.

I think the verse that has reverberated most strongly with me during this transition period has been Isaiah 30:15:

For thus said the Lord God, the Holy One of Israel:
In returning and rest you shall be saved;
    in quietness and in trust shall be your strength.
But you refused.”

My life before my return to full-time studies and that of many around me has been of an unprecedented busy kind. Even now, out of habit, I find myself getting sucked too easily into busyness, and that is the one thing I aim to avoid this year. It’s not so much a life that has lots of time to lie around that I seek, but at least one which allows you to get a good day in and not feel like you are constantly behind.

But joining a group of people that are focused on growing in their calling has been a shot in the arm. There is an anchor in these relationships. Never mind not being in a vocational guidance group, I haven’t been part of a consistent small group fellowship in a long time. It feels like coming home. This is undoubtedly the most important part of joining this group for me at the moment. We’ve been meeting for a month now (regular Monday mornings) and we’re also edified intellectually and emotionally and trained practically.

I think this is going to be a good year.

Repeating our mistakes


It is perhaps indicative of us as a society, that we misattribute a very telling quote. “Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results”, or something in that vein, is often attributed to Einstein (for more on that, see Perhaps it is our desire to lend weight to the saying that leads us to attribute it to Time’s person of the century (20th, that is), because let’s face it, don’t we want to get people to stop and think carefully about their actions?

There are other sayings that capture this thought, albeit in other trajectories, such as this poem by Steven Turner:

History repeats itself.
Has to.
No-one listens.

But one of the earlier sources (in terms of actual written literature, not a misattribution) is more haunting, because it lays bare our vulnerability as humans. In a pamphlet from the Hazelden Foundation, a narcotic addicts’ treatment centre, we find the quotation in one of their pamphlets:

“The price may seem higher for the addict who prostitutes for a fix than it is for the addict who merely lies to a doctor, but ultimately both pay with their lives. Insanity is repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results.”

Whether we prostitute ourselves or lie to a respectable member of society, repeating our mistakes while hoping for a better life will not lead us out of our malaise.

Your company and good intentions

Seldom has a truer word been spoken than “Hell is full of good intentions or desires”. I’m with Aldous Huxley on this one:


For those with academic tendencies, Huxley’s quote reflects Saint Bernard of Clairvaux’s (1091-1153) usage, but even earlier versions exist (I believe in research, so for this one, I leave it to you).

There is a lot that can be said about this in a variety of spheres of life, and people will be able to cite a number of instances where they were at the short end of the stick in relation to public policy, family member’s or even their faith community’s good intentions. But I want to focus this post on professional (or unprofessional, if you want) conduct in the workplace. This is an arena filled with some of the best examples of well meaning, yet worst results in terms of destroyed morale and the inefficacy that manifests. It is not surprising that worldwide, only 13% of employees are actively engaged in their work (you can read the original Gallup Report here). 63% of employees are not engaged, and 24% are actively disengaged i.e. they are unhappy, unproductive and likely to be a drain on the energy in the workplace.

South Africa fares far worse. Only 9% of employees are engaged, 46% are not engaged and 45% are actively disengaged. There are only two countries where a higher percentage of employees are actively disengaged than in South Africa: Tunisia and Algeria. We come in at joint third place with Syria. I’m not particularly sure this is a bronze medal we want to win. A cursory glance through the figures indicates that there is no correlation between employee engagement figures and economic growth data, nor between engagement and income inequality.

This is not surprising because Employee Engagement is measured by seeing how employees answer various questions, twelve in particular. These questions were settled upon after the Gallup organisation had conducted over one million interviews. Subsequent to that, they have conducted over ten million interviews. i.e. The questions were not arrived at based on some people’s perceptions or intentions (however good they may have been). Rather, a large amount of relevant data was collected, sifted and tested. After that, more research was done to test the initial findings (not unlike the scientific method). (You can read more about the questions and how they were arrived at here.) This is important, and is linked to why I started this postDear-Jeremy-Have-your-say-006 the way I did. Perhaps another quote may illustrate the point:

(The person in the picture isn’t Albert Camus, by the way, but I think he would approve of the photo.) You see, too often, good intentions lack understanding or learning related to the issues people face. I mentioned that people face a litany of assaults based on good intentions in a number of spheres of their lives. There is a lot of information available on various organisations and governments doing more damage to communities than good (here is a glimpse from one source.) This is more often than not, because people value intentions over data or outcomes.

The idea that intentions are more important than outcomes is based on thinking that values one’s own feelings and thoughts over the thoughts, feelings and even measurable experiences of others. This is where research and data come in, and hopefully people adjust their thinking when presented with credible data (if the cries of the hurt people are not enough). And I know, as the celebrated Stanford psychologist says:Head in Sand

All I can say is that someone said it a long time ago:

The heart is devious above all else;
    it is perverse—
    who can understand it?”

Jeremiah 17:9

If you’re in a workplace where the good intentions of your managers are constantly creating frustration and pain, and no matter how much you show them that what they are doing is not helping you, them or the company, you yourself will have to come up with some pretty creative solutions. The one hope I can give you, is that this is a characteristic of people, rather than companies. You don’t necessarily have to leave your company to get managed better.

The flip side though is that managers who are aiming to improve and are willing to “see” facts and figures can make some pretty simple changes to radically improve the engagement of employees. Back to the 12 questions, or actually, just the first two. If employees strongly agree with the following questions, they are far more likely to be engaged than employees that only partially agree or strongly disagree.

  1. Do I know what is expected of me at work?
  2. Do I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right?

I mention these two because managers need a place to start, and this is a good place that can have markedly good results in the engagement of those who report directly to those managers. Obviously there is a lot more to managing well, and if you, as a manager, don’t know what is expected of you, it may be difficult to enunciate the outcomes those under your supervision need to achieve. You need to have a chat to your manager then. But give clear guidelines based on outcomes and then make sure your direct reports have the tools they need to achieve those outcomes. In fact, if employees answer positively to all the other ten questions, but they answer negatively to these two, they will not be engaged. Define the outcomes, supply the tools.

Back to the theme then. Good intentions, like a nursery at work for toddlers, or the latest coffee machine, while useful (especially since mothers with toddlers will probably need good quality coffee at work) mean very little when employees don’t know what is expected of them. And when they know, but they aren’t given the resources to do the job, they can be even more frustrated. That scratches at the surface, as the above examples (the nursery and coffee machine) can be good. But other managers try to reshape workplaces in ways which only cause anxiety, like remodelling desk space according to the latest movie, rather than decent research, or telling employees that people want ‘certain things’ and then giving those ‘certain things’ to the employee without even asking the employee their opinion. These things drain employees. This is why appreciation is not expressed. Not because nothing was done, but because what was done was not done in the interests of the employee, but done out of a misplaced vision that was more important to the manager than the lives of the people who were meant to achieve the said vision.

Good managers know, employees are the stars.

On Polycarp and how we spend our time

Polycarp, the bishop of Smyrna (modern day Izmir in Turkey) is one of the most celebrated characters of ancient Christendom, yet we know very little about his life. He lived from 69 to 155 AD and as far we can gather from his disciple, Irenaeus, he was a disciple of the Apostle John and consecrated bishop of Smyrna by John himself.

Of his martyrdom, we know more as it is one of the most well documented events of antiquity. The Roman Emperors of the period had unleashed bitter attacks against the Christians of this era and members of the church recorded many of these persecutions and deaths. Polycarp was arrested on the charge of being a Christian — a member of what was then perceived as a politically dangerous cult whose rapid growth needed to be stopped. Amidst an angry mob, the Roman proconsul took pity on such a gentle old man and urged Polycarp to proclaim, “Caesar is Lord”. If only Polycarp would make this declaration and offer a small pinch of incense to Caesar’s statue he would escape torture and death. To this Polycarp responded, “Eighty-six years I have served Christ, and He never did me any wrong. How can I blaspheme my King who saved me?” Polycarp refused to compromise his beliefs, and thus, was burned alive at the stake. Tradition has it that the flames would not approach him and so he was stabbed by a Roman soldier.

But of what relevance is this account to us today? Two things strike one about his resolute faith in Christ. One was that for him to offer up his life for Jesus, he must truly have believed what he professed. Secondly, he would not participate in idolatry of any sort. He would not offer up even a pinch of incense to Caesar.

Are we as resolute in our faith? Death is not something we face as Christians practicing our faith in South Africa. That should never dull our minds to the reality that in the twentieth century, more Christians were martyred for their faith than in all the previous centuries put together since the death and resurrection of Jesus. And today Christians face persecution and martyrdom across the globe.

However, what we are faced with in South Africa is idolatry. And I suspect the idolatry we are most at risk of falling into and perpetuating is the idolatry of busyness. Today, we believe, not in one God, but in busyness. We believe in always being involved in something. We believe it is more important to be a human doing than to be a human being.

I’m not sure how many of you have ever compared the two accounts of the Ten Commandments in The Bible with each other. The longest of The Ten Commandments is to rest on the Sabbath. Not only is it the longest, but we find that in Exodus chapter 20, there are 90 words that make up this commandment. In Deuteronomy, this has been expanded to 129 words. Not one of the other commandments was expanded to this extent.

When Jesus was asked, what is the greatest of commandments, he replied, “To love the Lord your God, with all your heart, soul, mind and body and to love your neighbour as yourself.” The first three commandments can be summed up in Jesus’ first statement to love God, and the last six commandments can be summed up in his second statement to love one’s neighbour. Between these commandments, we find the commandment to rest, to take time out. As the Hebrew’s continued their walk with God, they found that if they did not observe this fourth commandment, they started falling short on all the others, which is why they placed such great emphasis on it.

But it’s not just the bible that tells us that. We know it from our own experience. When we are too busy, we start snapping at each other. We start missing out on quiet times, time to pray, read one’s Bible, or just to be. We also know it from current research. Marcus Buckingham in his book, “The One Thing You Need to Know” says that the one thing that marks out people who consistently outperform others is that they cut out what is not necessary. Jim Collins, in his book “Good to Great” says that one factor that marks great companies out against merely good companies is that they focus on what they are really good at and stop doing what they are merely average at.

This applies to you and what God calls you to be. You are good at certain things and you enjoy certain things. Where God is calling you to, is where what you are good at meets what you enjoy. Further to that, where your pleasure intersects with your skills, there is a need to be met in society. True greatness and pleasure rests in meeting the needs of others with your skills. Rather than have your fingers in ten pies, get your hands into one or two pies and take what you have and offer it to God. Cut out activities that drain you. Focus on being, not doing. You will find resistance. Some people will tell you that ‘Idle hands are the Devil’s hands’ and in some circumstances they are right. But in today’s context, we need to hear the fourth commandment. We need to rest.

Don’t even offer a small pinch of your time to mindless activities. Focus your whole being on God, have faith in Christ and offer your services to meet the needs of society.

Let anyone with ears listen!

The following text is from the sermon I delivered at my church this evening. The main text was Matthew 11:2-11 and you would do well to read it before reading the blog. Biblical quotations are from the NRSV and from Tom Wright’s ‘For Everyone’ series, including one or two adaptations.

“Blind people are seeing! Lame people are walking! Lepers are being cleansed! Deaf people can hear again! The dead are being raised to life! And – the poor are hearing the good news!” Would we be offended if that was happening in our parish?

This evening’s sermon contains much information and I offer this framework to guide you through it: I will do a brief survey of the themes from the previous two week’s sermons before looking at why John was no longer sure if Jesus was the one. We then look at the nature of Jesus’ cryptic reply to John’s queries and what Jesus has to say about John. Finally, we see what relevance this has for us today.

Two weeks ago we heard about the Babylonian exile of Judah initially in 597 BC and then more catastrophically, in 587 BC when the Temple and Jerusalem were destroyed. Exile is an important theme in Matthew. He show us this by arranging the genealogy of Jesus in the beginning of his Gospel into three sets of fourteen, the first headed up by Abraham echoing covenant, the second headed up by David echoing kingship and the third headed up by the first exilic king, Jechoniah, echoing exile. By rearranging the three sets of fourteen, we get six sets of seven and Jesus then heading up the seventh seven which I believe is Matthew’s method of saying Jesus is the climax of the covenant, the coming king and the one who brings the exile to a close. You will find this theme of exile throughout the sermon.

Then last week, we heard about John preaching that the Kingdom of Heaven is coming and urging those who heard him to repent. He offered a baptism in the Jordan River and heard the confessions of their sins. As far as we can tell, John was primarily baptising Israelites from the Judean countryside around Jerusalem and the Jordan.

The term ‘Kingdom of Heaven’ and other terms like ‘No King but God’ were used as revolutionary slogans at the time of Jesus. The primary meaning that was attached to these slogans was that Israel’s God was becoming King. Further, baptising people in the Jordan was symbolically acting out Israel coming out of the wilderness and entering into the Promised Land, just as they had done with Joshua after the Exodus from Egypt. Essentially, John was both vocally proclaiming that God was becoming King and symbolically acting out God’s chosen people taking up possession of their Promised Land. Put another way, he was acting out and proclaiming the end of exile. You might say, “But Philip, the end of the Babylonian captivity and hence the end of exile took place in 539 BC” Certainly, the geographical end of exile did take place then. But as in Malachi 3:1, and alluded to in our reading we have: “See I am sending my messenger ahead of you and he will clear your path before you, and the Lord whom you seek will suddenly come to his temple”. The Israelites of Jesus’ day were still waiting for the Lord to suddenly come to his temple. Exile would not be truly over until God took up his residence in the temple once again.

But John was also pointing to someone else, someone who’s sandals he was not worthy of carrying, and every indication was that this was Jesus. Only in our reading this evening, we find that John is no longer so sure and he sends some of his disciples to find out if Jesus is the one. Why is that?

Well, the most obvious reason is that John was sitting in prison and John was not so sure that this is where he was supposed to be if God was becoming king. But there are other more subtle reasons and sometimes the way we arrange our readings in the lectionary does not highlight these reasons. For instance we hear all about the blind seeing and the deaf hearing in this evening’s Psalm and the reading from Isaiah. But we as Christians have selected certain readings in light of Jesus and in order to tell a particular story at Christmas or at other times. I’m not always sure that we tell the right story though. This evening’s readings were not the primary texts consulted when people discussed the end of exile. Daniel chapter seven was probably the most popular and there we hear about one like the Son of Man coming with the clouds in heaven, of an everlasting Kingdom and of Judgement. Absolutely nothing about the blind seeing and the deaf hearing. Another one was Isaiah chapter sixty one, and at least we hear about setting the captives free and of debts being cancelled which is obviously good news to the poor. Of course, everybody had their own version of which captives were to be set free and who’s debts would be cancelled, but the point I’m trying to make is that most people were not too concerned about the deaf and the blind and the lame.

But Jesus clearly is.

When it comes to the blind and the lame, perhaps a not so well known story from 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles will illustrate the general feeling towards the blind and the lame. When David wanted to capture Jerusalem from the Jebusites, they taunted him by saying, “The regular guards have knocked off. We’re manning the walls with the blind. The lame will be their messengers. They’ll keep you out.” Obviously David took the city, and subsequently the blind and the lame were banned from the temple so that he wouldn’t be reminded of those taunts. The blind and the lame were not kindly looked upon by the majority of people at the time of Jesus. That Jesus was spending so much time healing the blind, the deaf and the lame was confusing for John, who was probably expecting a military defeat of the Romans, to be released and judgement against those Jews that kowtowed to the Romans.

This leads onto the next point, which is Jesus’ reply to John’s enquiry. Essentially, Jesus says, “‘Go and tell John what you’ve seen and heard. Blind people are seeing! Lame people are walking! Lepers are being cleansed! Deaf people can hear again! The dead are being raised to life! And the poor are hearing the good news!”

Not exactly a direct answer. Why does Jesus not say, “Yes, I’m the one.”?

Not, as many scholars would suggest, because Jesus is somehow not sure whether he is the Messiah. Nor because the end of exile is to be likened to some kind of private spirituality that you work out for yourself. I suggest the clue to a far more historically coherent possibility is found in the chapter of the Gospel preceding our reading, where Jesus tells the disciples “As you go, proclaim the good news, ‘The kingdom of heaven has come near.’ Cure the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons.” And then shortly after that he says, ‘See, I am sending you out like sheep into the midst of wolves; so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves. Beware of them, for they will hand you over to councils and flog you in their synagogues; and you will be dragged before governors and kings because of me’

John was sitting in prison precisely because he had pushed the boundary with Herod, the wannabe King of the Jews, just a bit too far. Now if the word got out that there was someone claiming to be the Messiah, in other words the real King of the Jews, that would not make the wannabe king too happy. As I mentioned before, Kingdom of Heaven was revolutionary talk. A messianic figure was a political figure. Jesus had just warned his disciples to be wise as serpents and as gentle as doves and that they would be hauled before rulers and councils and kings. Jesus was not going to make himself an easy target so he gives a cryptic answer which he follows with a cryptic blessing:

“And blessed is anyone who takes no offence at me.”

What is all this about? Cryptic answers, cryptic blessings! What is Jesus trying to accomplish here. For me, this is the most important line in this whole reading and if there is one thing you take home with you this evening, it is Jesus’ words to John, “Blessed is anyone who takes no offense at me.” I imagine that this blessing links directly into John’s expectations of what end of Exile means and what the Kingdom of Heaven is going to look like. Jesus is fulfilling some of those expectations, but not all of them, and then he is doing things which just about nobody thought was important.

Let us recap what most people were expecting:

A glorious Messianic figure was going to come and lead Israel to a military victory over Rome. Prisoners would be set free. Debts would be cancelled. The Resurrection of the Righteous would occur and the Messiah would then rebuild the temple and the Lord whom you seek will suddenly come to his temple. And Israel would then rule as proxies for this God over the rest of humanity. There were a few variations around this, but those were the general expectations of most Jews of Jesus’ day.

Now, what was Jesus doing? He was an itinerant preacher, preaching that God was becoming King, but this did not entail the cancelation of debts because all the debt records were kept in the temple. He was healing the blind and the deaf which just about nobody was expecting and he was raising the dead, but not in a once off resurrection of the righteous, but one by one he was raising people here and there, which although it didn’t happen often, was not something Israel was unfamiliar with.

Can you see how someone may be offended at Jesus’ suggestion that he may be the Messiah, albeit subtly? He wasn’t doing what was expected, he was doing something new. Will you be offended when God does something new?

After John’s disciples have left Jesus turns around and he says, “Actually John, you’re the one. You are the one of whom it is written: “See, I am sending my messenger ahead of you,
who will prepare your way before you.” No one born of a woman is greater than John, yet the least in the Kingdom of Heaven is greater than he. Here is Jesus being Cryptic once again. What does he mean now?

The analogy I draw here is to South Africa’s bid for the 2010 World Cup. Let us pretend for a moment that Danny Jordaan didn’t go from being CEO of the bid committee to CEO of the Local Organising Committee. Thinking back to 2003, what we could say is now that we have won the bid, Danny Jordaan, who was the most important person in the bid committee is not even as important as the least paid civil servant in the City of Cape Town who is planning the transport for the World Cup. The bid committee has done its job, but now we are starting something new. We don’t carry on bidding for the World Cup once we have won the bid, we start implementing the building, the transport planning, the training of the construction workers. We don’t do this because the bid committee was a failure; we do it precisely because they have done their work successfully. So it is with Jesus and John the Baptist. A few verses after our reading, in verse fourteen, Jesus says of John, “And if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come.” Jesus is the one whom you seek who will suddenly come to his temple. But rather than saying so directly, he says, “If you’ve got ears, then listen!” Matthew alludes to deafness and hearing seven times and to blindness and sight nine times in this passage alone. It would be careless to think that he was not trying to draw our attention to a very important point in this passage. Do we have ears to hear and eyes to see?

So what does this mean for us today, sitting in St Thomas as Anglicans, as Christians, as people of faith? Perhaps we should ask the question, who do we most identify with in this story? I don’t know how your minds work, but I can let you into how mine works. When I look at a story, I identify with the hero. I look and see who the hero is, and I say, “I’m like him” Now I realise that I am far closer to John and the rest of Israel. I read my bible and I look for texts that suit me and back up my point of view and I try and squeeze the Messiah into a box that suits me, a box that I can handle. That is exactly what John and others did. They had an idea of who the Messiah was and what he was going to do, and when Messiah came nobody recognised him because he did not fit their predefined criteria.

My biggest challenge to a congregation with theological understandings as diverse as St Thomas’ is to help people from across this broad spectrum to understand that maybe, just maybe, it’s not the person on the other side of the divide that has got it wrong. Maybe it’s me. Maybe I have put Jesus into a box which has nothing to do with his character or nature. Too often, because we believe in an unchanging God, we freeze him. We forget that we worship a living God. Before I relate all of the above to our advent theme of Joy I would like to leave you with a quote by the Jewish scholar, Jacob Neusner: “… to reflect and reconsider is a mark of learning and growth, a measure of curiosity and intellectual capacity. For us who spend our lives as teachers and learners in the realm of religion in the here and now, to reach a firm and final ‘position’ means to die, to stop our quest.”

As mentioned, our advent theme for this week is Joy. In light of all that we have heard above, I pray that we recognise that Joy will not always come in the ways expected. I pray that you will be open to the way God moves and that you will not try and force God to operate in a particular way. Are you able, as Paul did, to count it as all Joy when he was locked in prison? Jesus brought good news to the poor. I would like to suggest that true Joy will come to us when we bring the good news to the poor. Not good news of a future happiness in a disembodied heaven, but good news in the form of cancellation of debts, in terms of the ability to earn their own income and to participate in decision making processes of society more than once every five years. As I said, the Messiah was a political, this worldly figure. His message was not abstract. It challenged its hearers to a new way of being human. “Let anyone with ears listen!”

Most of my thoughts come from Luke Timothy Johnson’s ‘The Writings of the New Testament’ and NT Wright’s ‘The New Testament and the People of God’, ‘Jesus and the Victory of God’ and ‘Matthew for Everyone’. I pray that you have learned from this and are able to share with others some of the information.

Grace and peace


Hello world!

Often one imagines one’s first blog should be groundbreaking or philosophically profound, almost as though one’s first blog should be one’s best. I imagine this is a symptom of the spirit of the age where we long for instant perfection and quickly dismiss effort as betraying one’s true self. I hope my first blog is not my best and that there is a steady improvement in my ability to write and reach out to others exploring new horisons.

My main area of exploration will be the biblical narrative and how it relates to our lives. After studying towards a BTh for 18 months I recognise a severe gap between the knowledge of the academy and that of others. True, this exists in all fields of knowledge, but somehow the implications for those who call themselves ‘Christian’ is greater. I say this because if someone calls themselves a psychologist, one can infer that a certain amount of data and ability to interpret that data exists in the mind of the psychologist. I propose that one should be able to hold a ‘Christian’ to similar expectations.

This is not a pronouncement on whether a person is ‘saved’ or not (whatever that may mean). Rather it relates to biblical knowledge and living out that knowledge in a manner consistent with the message.

I will speak more about worldviews in my next blog, but as a brief introduction, suffice it to say that I approach my musings from the point of view of a somewhat open-minded Anglican, although I don’t find labels useful. Depending on your worldview, open-minded may mean liberal or soft on reason, or, I may not push the boundaries far enough for your liking. For me, the basis of my knowledge is the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus, and I see the Resurrection of Jesus as the launch of New Creation and his body as a transformed but very much physical body. I will address the Resurrection in more detail in later posts as well.

I look forward to this journey and hope you enjoy the ride.

Grace and peace.